ONE BODY IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH FLAPLESS SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, IMMEDIATE LOAD AND ZIRCONIUM REHAB: A CASE REPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v11i1.1136Keywords:
Implant, Flapless technique, Immediate load, ZirconiaAbstract
In the premolars region with space reduction of the edentulous zone, the 3mm and one piece implants are a good choice, as long as there is good quality and bone density. According to the literature found, the surgical Flapless technique preserves the soft tissues, offering the patient a more pleasant post treatment time. In these cases, the immediate esthetic load is the most recommended one, doing the definitive crown in zirconium. The purpose of these restorative procedures were to improve the dental esthetics through less invasive treatments and to maintain the normal masticatory and phonatory functions. The report shows a 48-year-old female patient, with edentulous space in the 15, replacement by a crown in cantilever. After doing the oral hygiene procedures, the wax diagnostic begin with the implant location analysis, crowns removal, temporaries collocation, one piece implant placement, technical Flapless surgery, immediate load and finally definitive zirconium crown placement (CAD-CAM).
Downloads
References
Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:21 - 27.
Campelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: A 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2002; 17: 271 - 276.
Lindeboom J, van Wijk A. A comparison of two implants techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs conventional flapped implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 366 – 370.
Aboud M, Koeck B, Stark H. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the posterior region. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2005; 20: 61-68.
Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, Ferri V, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2008; 23: 867-875.
Beagle JR. Developing keratinized mucosa around nonsubmerged dental implants. Part I: The use of vascularized flaps. Perio 2005; 2: 13–22.
Reddy MS, O’Neal J, Haigh S, Aponte-Wesson R, Geurs NC. Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2008; 23: 281-288.
VagkopoulouT, Koutayas SO, Koides P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4: 132 – 150.
Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Franz Hämmerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009; 20: 219–225.
Finne K, Rompen E, Toljanic J. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. Part 1: Marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2007; 22: 226 – 234.
Tinschert J. Estudio clínico prospectivo de las dentaduras fijas parciales posteriores en zirconio: seguimiento a 3 años. J Prosthod 2008: 21:217 – 222.
