Tendencias de uso de sistemas de instrumentación rotatoria en la práctica clínica de endodoncistas en diferentes asociaciones de endodoncia en Colombia
Palabras clave:
Endodoncia, Asociación Colombiana de Endodoncia, Tratamiento del conducto radicular, Ejercicio profesional
Resumen
Objetivo: Determinar cuáles son los sistemas de instrumentación rotatoria: más empleados por los endodoncistas adscritos a las diferentes asociaciones de endodoncia en Colombia. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de Corte Transversal que contó con la participación de 95 endodoncistas, que diligenciaron una encuesta virtual, la cual fue enviada a seis asociaciones de endodoncia de Colombia. Se tuvieron en cuenta variables sociodemográficas y de interés que permitieron determinar la frecuencia de uso, las ventajas así como desventajas de los diferentes sistemas rotatorios en la población de estudio. Teniendo en cuenta la resolución 8430 de 1993, se considera que es una investigación sin riesgo. Resultados: La participación de los Endodoncistas agremiados fue del 25%. El sistema de rotatorio más usado fue el. sistema Wave One Gold® (Dentsply- Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) con el 56,8%, seguido del sistema Hyflex® (Colténe) con un 12,6%. El sistema rotatorio que presentó mayores inconvenientes durante su uso fue el Sistema Protaper® (Dentsply - Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) con un 41%. En este estudio se evidenció que el sexo que más participó fue el femenino con un 64%. Conclusiones: El sistema rotatorio que mostró una mayor prevalencia de uso fue el Sistema Wave One Gold®, asociado a sus características en el diseño y propiedades físicas del material. Un gran número de endodoncistas tuvieron una capacitación previa al uso de los diferentes sistemas rotatorios.
Referencias
1. Alcota M, Compán G, Salinas C, Palma A. Estudio comparativo in vitro de la transportación del canal radicular utilizando 3 sistemas rotatorios de Níquel Titanio: Hero Shaper, Protaper Universal y Race. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2011;23(1):9–21. URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-246X2011000200002&lng=en.
2. Yalniz H, Koohnavard M, Oncu A, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Orhan K. Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021; 15(1):47–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
3. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, et al. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2004; 37(12): 832-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
4. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal. 2004;37(4):229–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
5. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1860–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023
6. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:203–2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
7. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004
8. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1293–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.023
9. Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rapisarda E, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J Endod. 2018;44(4):648–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.011
10. Generali L, Puddu P, Borghi A, Brancolini S, Lusvarghi L, Bolelli G, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):250–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13214
11. Escobar Ocampo A, Henao Bedoya A, Saavedra Amaya J, Serpa Vélez MF, Gutiérrez Barreto J. Transportación y centricidad en conductos curvos con ProTaper Next y PathFile / Transportation and Centering in Curved Canals with ProTaper Next and PathFile. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/16143
12. Silva E, Oliveira de Lima C, Vieira V, Antunes H, Lima Moreira EJ, Versiani M. Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Four Martensite-Based Nickel Titanium Reciprocating Instruments. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(3):231–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.16878
13. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Rios-Osorio N, Usme D, Jimenez C, Pinzon A, Rincón J, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01450-1
14. Riyahi AM, Bashiri A, Alshahrani K, Alshahrani S, Alamri HM, Al-Sudani D. Cyclic Fatigue Comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent. 2020;2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3190938
15. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):258–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025
16. Daugherty D, Gound T, Comer T. Comparison of Fracture Rate, Deformation Rate, and Efficiency Between Rotary Endodontic Instruments Driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod. 2001;27(2):93–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00008
17. Quiroz - Málaga Johanna Elizabeth. Comparison between the manual system of stainless steel files and rotating system of nickel titanium files in the conformation of curved radicular ducts in vitro. Revista Odontología Vital. 2019;2(31):31–6. URL: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-07752019000200031&lng=en.
18. Moradas Estrada M. Instrumentación rotatoria en Endodoncia ¿Qué tipo de lima o procedimiento es el más indicado? Av Odontoestomatol. 2017;33(4):151–60. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852017000400003&lng=es.
19. Canali LCF, Duque JA, Vivan RR, Bramante CM, Só MVR, Duarte MAH. Comparison of efficiency of the retreatment procedure between Wave One Gold and Wave One systems by Micro-CT and confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):337–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2441-y
20. Holguin SP, Zamora F, Assef E, De la Fuente P, Martínez M, Anaya J. Cyclic fatigue in the EndoSequence, Liberator and K3 rotary systems: Analysis under scanning electron microscope in an in vitro study. Revista ADM. 2014;71 (4):178-182. DOI: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDREVISTA=7&IDARTICULO=51981&IDPUBLICACION=5290
21. Covo Morales EE, Ruíz Llorente AM, Simancas Pallares MÁ. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesovestibulares de molares inferiores / Sodium Hypochlorite Penetration while comparing four Rotatory Preparation Systems in Lower-Molar Mesiobuccal. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2312/231247071007.pdf
22. Alvarez Rodríguez J, Clavera Vásquez Teresita de Jesús, Ruiz Candina Héctor J, Martínez Asanza Dachel, Chaple Gil Alain, Hernández Vera Juan Carlos. Preparación biomecánica de conductos radiculares. En: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. 2016. p. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1354.7124
23. Arzate-Sosa G, Lara-Carrillo E, Yahaira Villarreal-Camarena C, José Scougall-Vilchis R, Gabriela Ríos-Medina L. Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas rotatorios evaluando la penetración del irrigante con un medio de contraste. Estudio piloto. Revista ADM 2013; 70 (3): 140-145. URL: www.medigraphic.com/admwww.medigraphic.org.mx
24. Saber S, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):131–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291
25. García G, Alfie D, G& GF. TruNatomy: ¿un nuevo instrumento o un concepto diferente? Revista de La Asociacion Odontologica Argentina. 2020; 108(3): 153–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/9.
26. Çırakoglu NY, Özbay Y. Apically extruded debris associated with protaper next, protaper gold and trunatomy systems: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):30–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
27. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36(5):358–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
28. Hamdy TM, Galal M, Ismail AG, Abdelraouf RM. Evaluation of flexibility, microstructure and elemental analysis of some contemporary nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(21):3647–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.811
29. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
30. Pedullà E, Leanza G, La Rosa GRM, Gueli AM, Pasquale S, Plotino G, et al. Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat-treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):376–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13224
31. Bag Irem, Kurnaz Safa, Gülbandilar Aysel. An in vitro comparsion of apically extruded bacteria with Pro Taper Gold, Pro Taper universal an Pro Taper Next. Endodontic PracticeToday - Endo EPT. 2020;14(4):281–6. URL: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/endo/abstract.php?article_id=21496
32. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2008;105(6):798–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
33. Rojas Aracena D, Borie E, Fuentes R, Boldt F, Aracena A, Valenzuela R. In vitro evaluation of mesial molars canals preparation with manual Ni-Ti instruments and rotatory Protaper Universal. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2013;29(2):73–9. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852013000200003&lng=es.
34. Aguilar-Medina M, Ramos-Payan R, De E, Silva Benítez L, Ayala-Ham A. Extrusión apical durante la instrumentación del conducto radicular con cuatro diferentes sistemas mecanizados. Revista Oficial de la Unidad Académica de Odontología de la Universidad autónoma de Zacatecas. 2018;(2007–3461):138–51. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336262164
35. Srivastava S. Current Strategies in Metallurgical Advances of Rotary NiTi Instruments: A Review. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00333
36. Aoun CM, Walid Nehme PB. Review and classification of heat treatment procedures and their impact on mechanical behavior of endodontic. Int J Curr Res. 2017; 9(05):51300–6. URL: http://www.journalcra.com
37. Tudorache D, Dascălu IT, Dăguci L, Camen A, Diaconu OA, Turcu A, et al. Study on the mechanical treatment of root canals using Mtwo an Protaper Next Rotary systems. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021;13(1):171–84. URL: http://rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/STUDY-ON-THE-MECHANICAL-TREATMENT-OF-ROOT-CANALS-USING-MTWO-AND-PROTAPER-NEXT-ROTARY-SYSTEMS3.pdf
38. Evit Rajan John, Balram Kadaikal, Shreya Manocha, Sheetal Rao, Nidambur Avudev Ballal. Evaluation of micro crack propagation in root canal dentin after the use of reciproc and wave one gold rotary systems. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2018;11(3):201–7. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332873143
39. Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 10 different types of endodontic instruments: An in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):28–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/1/3
40. Santos E. Sistemas Rotatorios en Endodoncia [Investigación bibliográfica]. [Lima - Perú]: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2010. URL: https://www.cop.org.pe/bib/investigacionbibliografica/EVELYNPATRICIASANTOSARIAS.pdf
2. Yalniz H, Koohnavard M, Oncu A, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Orhan K. Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021; 15(1):47–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
3. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, et al. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2004; 37(12): 832-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
4. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal. 2004;37(4):229–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
5. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1860–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023
6. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:203–2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
7. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004
8. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1293–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.023
9. Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rapisarda E, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J Endod. 2018;44(4):648–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.011
10. Generali L, Puddu P, Borghi A, Brancolini S, Lusvarghi L, Bolelli G, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):250–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13214
11. Escobar Ocampo A, Henao Bedoya A, Saavedra Amaya J, Serpa Vélez MF, Gutiérrez Barreto J. Transportación y centricidad en conductos curvos con ProTaper Next y PathFile / Transportation and Centering in Curved Canals with ProTaper Next and PathFile. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/16143
12. Silva E, Oliveira de Lima C, Vieira V, Antunes H, Lima Moreira EJ, Versiani M. Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Four Martensite-Based Nickel Titanium Reciprocating Instruments. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(3):231–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.16878
13. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Rios-Osorio N, Usme D, Jimenez C, Pinzon A, Rincón J, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01450-1
14. Riyahi AM, Bashiri A, Alshahrani K, Alshahrani S, Alamri HM, Al-Sudani D. Cyclic Fatigue Comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent. 2020;2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3190938
15. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):258–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025
16. Daugherty D, Gound T, Comer T. Comparison of Fracture Rate, Deformation Rate, and Efficiency Between Rotary Endodontic Instruments Driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod. 2001;27(2):93–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00008
17. Quiroz - Málaga Johanna Elizabeth. Comparison between the manual system of stainless steel files and rotating system of nickel titanium files in the conformation of curved radicular ducts in vitro. Revista Odontología Vital. 2019;2(31):31–6. URL: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-07752019000200031&lng=en.
18. Moradas Estrada M. Instrumentación rotatoria en Endodoncia ¿Qué tipo de lima o procedimiento es el más indicado? Av Odontoestomatol. 2017;33(4):151–60. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852017000400003&lng=es.
19. Canali LCF, Duque JA, Vivan RR, Bramante CM, Só MVR, Duarte MAH. Comparison of efficiency of the retreatment procedure between Wave One Gold and Wave One systems by Micro-CT and confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):337–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2441-y
20. Holguin SP, Zamora F, Assef E, De la Fuente P, Martínez M, Anaya J. Cyclic fatigue in the EndoSequence, Liberator and K3 rotary systems: Analysis under scanning electron microscope in an in vitro study. Revista ADM. 2014;71 (4):178-182. DOI: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDREVISTA=7&IDARTICULO=51981&IDPUBLICACION=5290
21. Covo Morales EE, Ruíz Llorente AM, Simancas Pallares MÁ. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesovestibulares de molares inferiores / Sodium Hypochlorite Penetration while comparing four Rotatory Preparation Systems in Lower-Molar Mesiobuccal. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2312/231247071007.pdf
22. Alvarez Rodríguez J, Clavera Vásquez Teresita de Jesús, Ruiz Candina Héctor J, Martínez Asanza Dachel, Chaple Gil Alain, Hernández Vera Juan Carlos. Preparación biomecánica de conductos radiculares. En: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. 2016. p. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1354.7124
23. Arzate-Sosa G, Lara-Carrillo E, Yahaira Villarreal-Camarena C, José Scougall-Vilchis R, Gabriela Ríos-Medina L. Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas rotatorios evaluando la penetración del irrigante con un medio de contraste. Estudio piloto. Revista ADM 2013; 70 (3): 140-145. URL: www.medigraphic.com/admwww.medigraphic.org.mx
24. Saber S, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):131–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291
25. García G, Alfie D, G& GF. TruNatomy: ¿un nuevo instrumento o un concepto diferente? Revista de La Asociacion Odontologica Argentina. 2020; 108(3): 153–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/9.
26. Çırakoglu NY, Özbay Y. Apically extruded debris associated with protaper next, protaper gold and trunatomy systems: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):30–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
27. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36(5):358–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
28. Hamdy TM, Galal M, Ismail AG, Abdelraouf RM. Evaluation of flexibility, microstructure and elemental analysis of some contemporary nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(21):3647–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.811
29. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
30. Pedullà E, Leanza G, La Rosa GRM, Gueli AM, Pasquale S, Plotino G, et al. Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat-treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):376–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13224
31. Bag Irem, Kurnaz Safa, Gülbandilar Aysel. An in vitro comparsion of apically extruded bacteria with Pro Taper Gold, Pro Taper universal an Pro Taper Next. Endodontic PracticeToday - Endo EPT. 2020;14(4):281–6. URL: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/endo/abstract.php?article_id=21496
32. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2008;105(6):798–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
33. Rojas Aracena D, Borie E, Fuentes R, Boldt F, Aracena A, Valenzuela R. In vitro evaluation of mesial molars canals preparation with manual Ni-Ti instruments and rotatory Protaper Universal. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2013;29(2):73–9. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852013000200003&lng=es.
34. Aguilar-Medina M, Ramos-Payan R, De E, Silva Benítez L, Ayala-Ham A. Extrusión apical durante la instrumentación del conducto radicular con cuatro diferentes sistemas mecanizados. Revista Oficial de la Unidad Académica de Odontología de la Universidad autónoma de Zacatecas. 2018;(2007–3461):138–51. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336262164
35. Srivastava S. Current Strategies in Metallurgical Advances of Rotary NiTi Instruments: A Review. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00333
36. Aoun CM, Walid Nehme PB. Review and classification of heat treatment procedures and their impact on mechanical behavior of endodontic. Int J Curr Res. 2017; 9(05):51300–6. URL: http://www.journalcra.com
37. Tudorache D, Dascălu IT, Dăguci L, Camen A, Diaconu OA, Turcu A, et al. Study on the mechanical treatment of root canals using Mtwo an Protaper Next Rotary systems. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021;13(1):171–84. URL: http://rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/STUDY-ON-THE-MECHANICAL-TREATMENT-OF-ROOT-CANALS-USING-MTWO-AND-PROTAPER-NEXT-ROTARY-SYSTEMS3.pdf
38. Evit Rajan John, Balram Kadaikal, Shreya Manocha, Sheetal Rao, Nidambur Avudev Ballal. Evaluation of micro crack propagation in root canal dentin after the use of reciproc and wave one gold rotary systems. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2018;11(3):201–7. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332873143
39. Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 10 different types of endodontic instruments: An in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):28–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/1/3
40. Santos E. Sistemas Rotatorios en Endodoncia [Investigación bibliográfica]. [Lima - Perú]: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2010. URL: https://www.cop.org.pe/bib/investigacionbibliografica/EVELYNPATRICIASANTOSARIAS.pdf
Publicado
2023-08-08
Cómo citar
Ramos Castañeda, A., Flórez Rodríguez, L., Maestre Romero, S., & Gay Ortiz, M. (2023). Tendencias de uso de sistemas de instrumentación rotatoria en la práctica clínica de endodoncistas en diferentes asociaciones de endodoncia en Colombia. Ustasalud, 22(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v22i2.2947
Número
Sección
Artículos de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
