Trends in the use of rotary instrumentation systems in the clinical practice of endodontists in different endodontic associations in Colombia
Keywords:
Endodontics, Professional practice, Colombian Association of Endodontics, Root canal therapy
Abstract
Objective: To determine the characteristics of rotary instrumentation systems: more used by endodontists attached to the different endodontic associations in Colombia. Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out with the participation of 95 endodontists, who completed a virtual survey, which was sent to six endodontic associations in Colombia. Sociodemographic and interest variables were taken into account that allowed determining the frequency of use, the advantages as well as disadvantages of the different rotary systems in the study population. Taking into account resolution 8430 of 1993, it is considered to be an investigation without risk. Results: The participation of affiliated Endodontists was 25%. The most used rotary system was the. Wave One Gold® system (Dentsply-Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with 56.8%, followed by the Hyflex® system (Colténe) with 12.6%. The rotary system that presented the greatest inconveniences during its use was the Protaper® System (Dentsply - Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with 41%. In this study it was evidenced that the sex that participated the most was female with 64%. Conclusions: The rotary system that showed a higher prevalence of use was the Wave One Gold® System, associated with its characteristics in the design and physical properties of the material. A large number of endodontists had prior training in the use of the different rotary systems.
References
1. Alcota M, Compán G, Salinas C, Palma A. Estudio comparativo in vitro de la transportación del canal radicular utilizando 3 sistemas rotatorios de Níquel Titanio: Hero Shaper, Protaper Universal y Race. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2011;23(1):9–21. URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-246X2011000200002&lng=en.
2. Yalniz H, Koohnavard M, Oncu A, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Orhan K. Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021; 15(1):47–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
3. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, et al. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2004; 37(12): 832-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
4. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal. 2004;37(4):229–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
5. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1860–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023
6. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:203–2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
7. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004
8. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1293–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.023
9. Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rapisarda E, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J Endod. 2018;44(4):648–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.011
10. Generali L, Puddu P, Borghi A, Brancolini S, Lusvarghi L, Bolelli G, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):250–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13214
11. Escobar Ocampo A, Henao Bedoya A, Saavedra Amaya J, Serpa Vélez MF, Gutiérrez Barreto J. Transportación y centricidad en conductos curvos con ProTaper Next y PathFile / Transportation and Centering in Curved Canals with ProTaper Next and PathFile. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/16143
12. Silva E, Oliveira de Lima C, Vieira V, Antunes H, Lima Moreira EJ, Versiani M. Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Four Martensite-Based Nickel Titanium Reciprocating Instruments. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(3):231–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.16878
13. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Rios-Osorio N, Usme D, Jimenez C, Pinzon A, Rincón J, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01450-1
14. Riyahi AM, Bashiri A, Alshahrani K, Alshahrani S, Alamri HM, Al-Sudani D. Cyclic Fatigue Comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent. 2020;2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3190938
15. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):258–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025
16. Daugherty D, Gound T, Comer T. Comparison of Fracture Rate, Deformation Rate, and Efficiency Between Rotary Endodontic Instruments Driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod. 2001;27(2):93–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00008
17. Quiroz - Málaga Johanna Elizabeth. Comparison between the manual system of stainless steel files and rotating system of nickel titanium files in the conformation of curved radicular ducts in vitro. Revista Odontología Vital. 2019;2(31):31–6. URL: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-07752019000200031&lng=en.
18. Moradas Estrada M. Instrumentación rotatoria en Endodoncia ¿Qué tipo de lima o procedimiento es el más indicado? Av Odontoestomatol. 2017;33(4):151–60. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852017000400003&lng=es.
19. Canali LCF, Duque JA, Vivan RR, Bramante CM, Só MVR, Duarte MAH. Comparison of efficiency of the retreatment procedure between Wave One Gold and Wave One systems by Micro-CT and confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):337–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2441-y
20. Holguin SP, Zamora F, Assef E, De la Fuente P, Martínez M, Anaya J. Cyclic fatigue in the EndoSequence, Liberator and K3 rotary systems: Analysis under scanning electron microscope in an in vitro study. Revista ADM. 2014;71 (4):178-182. DOI: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDREVISTA=7&IDARTICULO=51981&IDPUBLICACION=5290
21. Covo Morales EE, Ruíz Llorente AM, Simancas Pallares MÁ. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesovestibulares de molares inferiores / Sodium Hypochlorite Penetration while comparing four Rotatory Preparation Systems in Lower-Molar Mesiobuccal. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2312/231247071007.pdf
22. Alvarez Rodríguez J, Clavera Vásquez Teresita de Jesús, Ruiz Candina Héctor J, Martínez Asanza Dachel, Chaple Gil Alain, Hernández Vera Juan Carlos. Preparación biomecánica de conductos radiculares. En: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. 2016. p. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1354.7124
23. Arzate-Sosa G, Lara-Carrillo E, Yahaira Villarreal-Camarena C, José Scougall-Vilchis R, Gabriela Ríos-Medina L. Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas rotatorios evaluando la penetración del irrigante con un medio de contraste. Estudio piloto. Revista ADM 2013; 70 (3): 140-145. URL: www.medigraphic.com/admwww.medigraphic.org.mx
24. Saber S, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):131–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291
25. García G, Alfie D, G& GF. TruNatomy: ¿un nuevo instrumento o un concepto diferente? Revista de La Asociacion Odontologica Argentina. 2020; 108(3): 153–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/9.
26. Çırakoglu NY, Özbay Y. Apically extruded debris associated with protaper next, protaper gold and trunatomy systems: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):30–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
27. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36(5):358–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
28. Hamdy TM, Galal M, Ismail AG, Abdelraouf RM. Evaluation of flexibility, microstructure and elemental analysis of some contemporary nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(21):3647–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.811
29. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
30. Pedullà E, Leanza G, La Rosa GRM, Gueli AM, Pasquale S, Plotino G, et al. Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat-treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):376–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13224
31. Bag Irem, Kurnaz Safa, Gülbandilar Aysel. An in vitro comparsion of apically extruded bacteria with Pro Taper Gold, Pro Taper universal an Pro Taper Next. Endodontic PracticeToday - Endo EPT. 2020;14(4):281–6. URL: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/endo/abstract.php?article_id=21496
32. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2008;105(6):798–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
33. Rojas Aracena D, Borie E, Fuentes R, Boldt F, Aracena A, Valenzuela R. In vitro evaluation of mesial molars canals preparation with manual Ni-Ti instruments and rotatory Protaper Universal. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2013;29(2):73–9. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852013000200003&lng=es.
34. Aguilar-Medina M, Ramos-Payan R, De E, Silva Benítez L, Ayala-Ham A. Extrusión apical durante la instrumentación del conducto radicular con cuatro diferentes sistemas mecanizados. Revista Oficial de la Unidad Académica de Odontología de la Universidad autónoma de Zacatecas. 2018;(2007–3461):138–51. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336262164
35. Srivastava S. Current Strategies in Metallurgical Advances of Rotary NiTi Instruments: A Review. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00333
36. Aoun CM, Walid Nehme PB. Review and classification of heat treatment procedures and their impact on mechanical behavior of endodontic. Int J Curr Res. 2017; 9(05):51300–6. URL: http://www.journalcra.com
37. Tudorache D, Dascălu IT, Dăguci L, Camen A, Diaconu OA, Turcu A, et al. Study on the mechanical treatment of root canals using Mtwo an Protaper Next Rotary systems. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021;13(1):171–84. URL: http://rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/STUDY-ON-THE-MECHANICAL-TREATMENT-OF-ROOT-CANALS-USING-MTWO-AND-PROTAPER-NEXT-ROTARY-SYSTEMS3.pdf
38. Evit Rajan John, Balram Kadaikal, Shreya Manocha, Sheetal Rao, Nidambur Avudev Ballal. Evaluation of micro crack propagation in root canal dentin after the use of reciproc and wave one gold rotary systems. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2018;11(3):201–7. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332873143
39. Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 10 different types of endodontic instruments: An in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):28–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/1/3
40. Santos E. Sistemas Rotatorios en Endodoncia [Investigación bibliográfica]. [Lima - Perú]: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2010. URL: https://www.cop.org.pe/bib/investigacionbibliografica/EVELYNPATRICIASANTOSARIAS.pdf
2. Yalniz H, Koohnavard M, Oncu A, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Orhan K. Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021; 15(1):47–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
3. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, et al. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2004; 37(12): 832-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
4. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal. 2004;37(4):229–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
5. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1860–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023
6. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:203–2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
7. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004
8. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1293–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.023
9. Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rapisarda E, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J Endod. 2018;44(4):648–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.011
10. Generali L, Puddu P, Borghi A, Brancolini S, Lusvarghi L, Bolelli G, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):250–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13214
11. Escobar Ocampo A, Henao Bedoya A, Saavedra Amaya J, Serpa Vélez MF, Gutiérrez Barreto J. Transportación y centricidad en conductos curvos con ProTaper Next y PathFile / Transportation and Centering in Curved Canals with ProTaper Next and PathFile. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/16143
12. Silva E, Oliveira de Lima C, Vieira V, Antunes H, Lima Moreira EJ, Versiani M. Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Four Martensite-Based Nickel Titanium Reciprocating Instruments. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(3):231–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.16878
13. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Rios-Osorio N, Usme D, Jimenez C, Pinzon A, Rincón J, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01450-1
14. Riyahi AM, Bashiri A, Alshahrani K, Alshahrani S, Alamri HM, Al-Sudani D. Cyclic Fatigue Comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent. 2020;2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3190938
15. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):258–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025
16. Daugherty D, Gound T, Comer T. Comparison of Fracture Rate, Deformation Rate, and Efficiency Between Rotary Endodontic Instruments Driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod. 2001;27(2):93–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00008
17. Quiroz - Málaga Johanna Elizabeth. Comparison between the manual system of stainless steel files and rotating system of nickel titanium files in the conformation of curved radicular ducts in vitro. Revista Odontología Vital. 2019;2(31):31–6. URL: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-07752019000200031&lng=en.
18. Moradas Estrada M. Instrumentación rotatoria en Endodoncia ¿Qué tipo de lima o procedimiento es el más indicado? Av Odontoestomatol. 2017;33(4):151–60. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852017000400003&lng=es.
19. Canali LCF, Duque JA, Vivan RR, Bramante CM, Só MVR, Duarte MAH. Comparison of efficiency of the retreatment procedure between Wave One Gold and Wave One systems by Micro-CT and confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):337–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2441-y
20. Holguin SP, Zamora F, Assef E, De la Fuente P, Martínez M, Anaya J. Cyclic fatigue in the EndoSequence, Liberator and K3 rotary systems: Analysis under scanning electron microscope in an in vitro study. Revista ADM. 2014;71 (4):178-182. DOI: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDREVISTA=7&IDARTICULO=51981&IDPUBLICACION=5290
21. Covo Morales EE, Ruíz Llorente AM, Simancas Pallares MÁ. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesovestibulares de molares inferiores / Sodium Hypochlorite Penetration while comparing four Rotatory Preparation Systems in Lower-Molar Mesiobuccal. Universitas Odontologica. 2015;34(73). URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2312/231247071007.pdf
22. Alvarez Rodríguez J, Clavera Vásquez Teresita de Jesús, Ruiz Candina Héctor J, Martínez Asanza Dachel, Chaple Gil Alain, Hernández Vera Juan Carlos. Preparación biomecánica de conductos radiculares. En: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. 2016. p. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1354.7124
23. Arzate-Sosa G, Lara-Carrillo E, Yahaira Villarreal-Camarena C, José Scougall-Vilchis R, Gabriela Ríos-Medina L. Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas rotatorios evaluando la penetración del irrigante con un medio de contraste. Estudio piloto. Revista ADM 2013; 70 (3): 140-145. URL: www.medigraphic.com/admwww.medigraphic.org.mx
24. Saber S, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(2):131–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291
25. García G, Alfie D, G& GF. TruNatomy: ¿un nuevo instrumento o un concepto diferente? Revista de La Asociacion Odontologica Argentina. 2020; 108(3): 153–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/9.
26. Çırakoglu NY, Özbay Y. Apically extruded debris associated with protaper next, protaper gold and trunatomy systems: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):30–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
27. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36(5):358–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
28. Hamdy TM, Galal M, Ismail AG, Abdelraouf RM. Evaluation of flexibility, microstructure and elemental analysis of some contemporary nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(21):3647–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.811
29. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
30. Pedullà E, Leanza G, La Rosa GRM, Gueli AM, Pasquale S, Plotino G, et al. Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat-treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):376–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13224
31. Bag Irem, Kurnaz Safa, Gülbandilar Aysel. An in vitro comparsion of apically extruded bacteria with Pro Taper Gold, Pro Taper universal an Pro Taper Next. Endodontic PracticeToday - Endo EPT. 2020;14(4):281–6. URL: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/endo/abstract.php?article_id=21496
32. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2008;105(6):798–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
33. Rojas Aracena D, Borie E, Fuentes R, Boldt F, Aracena A, Valenzuela R. In vitro evaluation of mesial molars canals preparation with manual Ni-Ti instruments and rotatory Protaper Universal. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2013;29(2):73–9. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852013000200003&lng=es.
34. Aguilar-Medina M, Ramos-Payan R, De E, Silva Benítez L, Ayala-Ham A. Extrusión apical durante la instrumentación del conducto radicular con cuatro diferentes sistemas mecanizados. Revista Oficial de la Unidad Académica de Odontología de la Universidad autónoma de Zacatecas. 2018;(2007–3461):138–51. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336262164
35. Srivastava S. Current Strategies in Metallurgical Advances of Rotary NiTi Instruments: A Review. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00333
36. Aoun CM, Walid Nehme PB. Review and classification of heat treatment procedures and their impact on mechanical behavior of endodontic. Int J Curr Res. 2017; 9(05):51300–6. URL: http://www.journalcra.com
37. Tudorache D, Dascălu IT, Dăguci L, Camen A, Diaconu OA, Turcu A, et al. Study on the mechanical treatment of root canals using Mtwo an Protaper Next Rotary systems. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021;13(1):171–84. URL: http://rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/STUDY-ON-THE-MECHANICAL-TREATMENT-OF-ROOT-CANALS-USING-MTWO-AND-PROTAPER-NEXT-ROTARY-SYSTEMS3.pdf
38. Evit Rajan John, Balram Kadaikal, Shreya Manocha, Sheetal Rao, Nidambur Avudev Ballal. Evaluation of micro crack propagation in root canal dentin after the use of reciproc and wave one gold rotary systems. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2018;11(3):201–7. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332873143
39. Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 10 different types of endodontic instruments: An in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):28–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/1/3
40. Santos E. Sistemas Rotatorios en Endodoncia [Investigación bibliográfica]. [Lima - Perú]: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2010. URL: https://www.cop.org.pe/bib/investigacionbibliografica/EVELYNPATRICIASANTOSARIAS.pdf
Published
2023-08-08
How to Cite
Ramos Castañeda, A., Flórez Rodríguez, L., Maestre Romero, S., & Gay Ortiz, M. (2023). Trends in the use of rotary instrumentation systems in the clinical practice of endodontists in different endodontic associations in Colombia. Ustasalud, 22(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v22i2.2947
Issue
Section
Scientific and technological research papers
