Efectividad del sistema rotatorio Mtwo® e hipoclorito de sodio en la eliminación del Enterococcus faecalis. Revisión de la literatura
Palabras clave:
hipoclorito de sodio, Enterococcus faecalis, preparación del conducto radicular, endodoncia
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la efectividad del sistema rotatorio Mtwo® y del hipoclorito de sodio en la eliminación de Enterococcus faecalis.
Se realizó una revisión de la literatura de estudios experimentales In vitro y Ex vivo, publicados desde 2010 hasta 2020 en las bases de datos MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCOhost y Scopus, disponibles en texto completo, publicados en español e inglés. Se seleccionaron los artículos de acuerdo con los criterios establecidos y se analizó el contenido de cada uno de ellos por medio de una tabla matriz en la cual se incluyeron los principales hallazgos.
Se identificaron cuarenta y cuatro artículos, de los cuales se incluyeron cinco estudios. La efectividad de la solución irrigadora (NaOCl) demostró resultados a concentraciones de 2.5% y 5.25% y la aplicación del sistema rotatorio Mtwo® reportó disminución del recuento bacteriano al compararlo con otros métodos de instrumentación, así como un recrecimiento menor de bacterias después del tratamiento con este sistema.
Las concentraciones de hipoclorito de sodio al 2,5% y al 5,25% y el uso del sistema de instrumentación Mtwo® son eficaces en la eliminación del Enterococcus faecalis.
Referencias
1. de Almeida J, Cechella BC, Bernardi AV, de Lima Pimenta A, Felippe WT. Effectiveness of nanoparticles solutions and conventional endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(3):347-351. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_634_15.
2. Al-Zubidi M, Widziolek M, Court EK, Gains AF, Smith RE, Ansbro K, et al. Identification of novel bacteriophages with therapeutic potential that target Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun. 2019;87(11): e00512-19. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00512-19.
3. Swimberghe RCD, Coenye T, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2019;52(5):604-628. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13050.
4. Neelakantan P, Romero M, Vera J, Daood U, Khan AU, Yan A, et al. Biofilms in endodontics-current status and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 11;18(8): 1748.DOI: 10.3390/ijms18081748.
5. Barbosa-Ribeiro M, De-Jesus-Soares A, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Almeida JF, Gomes BP. Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of virulence genes of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from teeth with failure of the endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2016;42(7):1022-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.015.
6. Peters OA, de Azevedo Bahia MG, Pereira ES. Contemporary root canal preparation: Innovations in biomechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(1): 37-58.DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.002
7. Oliveira KV, Silva BMD, Leonardi DP, Crozeta BM, Sousa-Neto MD, Baratto-Filho F, et al. Effectiveness of different final irrigation techniques and placement of endodontic sealer into dentinal tubules. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e114. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0114
8. Generali L, Cavani F, Serena V, Pettenati C, Righi E, Bertoldi C. Effect of different irrigation systems on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2017;43(4):652-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.004.
9. Borzini L, Condò R, De Dominicis P, Casaglia A, Cerroni L. Root canal irrigation: Chemical agents and plant extracts against Enterococcus faecalis. Open Dent J. 2016; 19 (10):692-703. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010692.
10. Prada I, Micó-Muñoz P, Giner-Lluesma T, Micó-Martínez P, Collado-Castellano N, Manzano-Saiz A. Influence of microbiology on endodontic failure. Literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(3): e364-e372. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22907.
11. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cavenago BC, Hungaro Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M. Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(9):3189-3194. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2411-4.
12. Bergenholtz G. Assessment of treatment failure in endodontic therapy. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(10):753-8. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12423.
13. Covo, E; Ruiz, M; Simancas, M. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesiovestibulares de molares inferiores. Univ Odontol. 2015; 34(73): 53-59.
14. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x.
15. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez SB, Díaz-Romero CM, Gamboa-Martínez LF, Niño-Barrera JL. Evaluación in vitro de la fractura de los instrumentos rotatorios MTWO® y ProTaper®. Acta Odontol. Colomb. 2013 Jul (cited 06 oct 2020); 3(2): 41-56. URL Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actaodontocol/article/view/41898/43605
16. Ferrer-Luque CM, Bejarano I, Ruiz-Linares M, Baca P. Reduction in Enteroccocus faecalis counts - a comparison between rotary and reciprocating systems. Int Endod J. 2014;47(4):380-6. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12158.
17. Nakamura V, Candeiro G, Cai S, Gavini G. Ex vivo evaluation of three instrumentation techniques on E. faecalis biofilm within oval shaped root canals. Braz. oral res. [Internet]. 2015; 29( 1 ): 1-7.
18. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Visai L, Selan L, Colombo M, Bianchi S, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35(10):826-31. DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000160.
19. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Florindi F, et al. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigants. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):914-919.
20. Pourhajibagher M, Chiniforush N, Shahabi S, Palizvani M, Bahador A. Antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against intracanal Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro comparative study with traditional endodontic irrigation solutions. J Dent (Tehran). 2018;15(4):197-204.
21. Yanling C, Hongyan L, Xi W, Wim C, Dongmei D. Efficacy of relacin combined with sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26: e20160608. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0608.
22. Yu MK, Kim MA, Rosa V, Hwang YC, Del Fabbro M, Sohn WJ, et al. Role of extracellular DNA in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27: e20180699. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0699.
23. Putzer B, Zilm P, Ratnayake J, Cathro P. Comparative efficacy of endodontic medicaments and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Aust Dent J. 2018;63(2):208-216. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12580.
24. Dioguardi M, Gioia GD, Illuzzi G, Laneve E, Cocco A, Troiano G. Endodontic irrigants: Different methods to improve efficacy and related problems. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(3):459-466. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_56_18.
25. Dioguardi M, Di Gioia G, Illuzzi G, Arena C, Caponio VCA, Caloro GA, et al. Inspection of the microbiota in endodontic lesions. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(2):47. DOI: 10.3390/dj7020047.
26. Vasudeva A, Sinha DJ, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Garg P, Upadhyay D. Disinfection of dentinal tubules with 2% Chlorhexidine gel, Calcium hydroxide and herbal intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro study. Singapore Dent J. 2017;38:39-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdj.2017.06.001.
27. Rodrigues CT, de Andrade FB, de Vasconcelos LRSM, Midena RZ, Pereira TC, Kuga MC, et al. Antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm and infected dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 2018;51(8):901-911. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12904.
28. Sohrabi K, Sooratgar A, Zolfagharnasab K, Kharazifard MJ, Afkhami F. Antibacterial activity of diode laser and sodium hypochlorite in Enterococcus faecalis-contaminated root canals. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(1):8-12. DOI: 10.7508/iej.2016.01.002.
29. Morales A. Penetración Dentinaria in vitro del Hipoclorito de Sodio a Diferentes Concentraciones con las Técnicas de Irrigación Convencional y Ultrasónica Pasiva. Int. J. Odontostomat. [Internet]. 2017; 11( 3 ): 305-309.
30. Taneja S, Kumari M, Barua M, Dudeja C, Malik M. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(1):67-71. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.156813.
31. Plotino G, Grande NM, Sorci E, Malagnino VA, Somma F. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39(9):716-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01142.x.
32. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39(3):196-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x.
33. Bürklein S, Hiller C, Huda M, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2011;44(5):447-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01850.x.
34. Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, Ferreira NS, Endo MS, Freitas LF, Camões IC. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. J Endod. 2014;40(5):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.006.
35. Krajczár K, et al. Chemomechanical preparation by hand instrumentation and by Mtwo engine-driven rotary files, an ex vivo study. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.2012: 4(3):e146.
36. Özsezer E, Kalyoncuoğlu E, Duran E, Yılmaz A, Tanrıverdi Y. Efficacy of different instrumentation techniques on reducing Enterococcus faecalis infection in experimentally infected root canals. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014;9(1): 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.03.024.
2. Al-Zubidi M, Widziolek M, Court EK, Gains AF, Smith RE, Ansbro K, et al. Identification of novel bacteriophages with therapeutic potential that target Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun. 2019;87(11): e00512-19. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00512-19.
3. Swimberghe RCD, Coenye T, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2019;52(5):604-628. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13050.
4. Neelakantan P, Romero M, Vera J, Daood U, Khan AU, Yan A, et al. Biofilms in endodontics-current status and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 11;18(8): 1748.DOI: 10.3390/ijms18081748.
5. Barbosa-Ribeiro M, De-Jesus-Soares A, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Almeida JF, Gomes BP. Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of virulence genes of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from teeth with failure of the endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2016;42(7):1022-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.015.
6. Peters OA, de Azevedo Bahia MG, Pereira ES. Contemporary root canal preparation: Innovations in biomechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(1): 37-58.DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.002
7. Oliveira KV, Silva BMD, Leonardi DP, Crozeta BM, Sousa-Neto MD, Baratto-Filho F, et al. Effectiveness of different final irrigation techniques and placement of endodontic sealer into dentinal tubules. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e114. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0114
8. Generali L, Cavani F, Serena V, Pettenati C, Righi E, Bertoldi C. Effect of different irrigation systems on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2017;43(4):652-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.004.
9. Borzini L, Condò R, De Dominicis P, Casaglia A, Cerroni L. Root canal irrigation: Chemical agents and plant extracts against Enterococcus faecalis. Open Dent J. 2016; 19 (10):692-703. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010692.
10. Prada I, Micó-Muñoz P, Giner-Lluesma T, Micó-Martínez P, Collado-Castellano N, Manzano-Saiz A. Influence of microbiology on endodontic failure. Literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(3): e364-e372. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22907.
11. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cavenago BC, Hungaro Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M. Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(9):3189-3194. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2411-4.
12. Bergenholtz G. Assessment of treatment failure in endodontic therapy. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(10):753-8. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12423.
13. Covo, E; Ruiz, M; Simancas, M. Penetración del hipoclorito de sodio al comparar cuatro sistemas rotatorios de preparación en conductos mesiovestibulares de molares inferiores. Univ Odontol. 2015; 34(73): 53-59.
14. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x.
15. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez SB, Díaz-Romero CM, Gamboa-Martínez LF, Niño-Barrera JL. Evaluación in vitro de la fractura de los instrumentos rotatorios MTWO® y ProTaper®. Acta Odontol. Colomb. 2013 Jul (cited 06 oct 2020); 3(2): 41-56. URL Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actaodontocol/article/view/41898/43605
16. Ferrer-Luque CM, Bejarano I, Ruiz-Linares M, Baca P. Reduction in Enteroccocus faecalis counts - a comparison between rotary and reciprocating systems. Int Endod J. 2014;47(4):380-6. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12158.
17. Nakamura V, Candeiro G, Cai S, Gavini G. Ex vivo evaluation of three instrumentation techniques on E. faecalis biofilm within oval shaped root canals. Braz. oral res. [Internet]. 2015; 29( 1 ): 1-7.
18. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Visai L, Selan L, Colombo M, Bianchi S, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35(10):826-31. DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000160.
19. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Florindi F, et al. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigants. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):914-919.
20. Pourhajibagher M, Chiniforush N, Shahabi S, Palizvani M, Bahador A. Antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against intracanal Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro comparative study with traditional endodontic irrigation solutions. J Dent (Tehran). 2018;15(4):197-204.
21. Yanling C, Hongyan L, Xi W, Wim C, Dongmei D. Efficacy of relacin combined with sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26: e20160608. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0608.
22. Yu MK, Kim MA, Rosa V, Hwang YC, Del Fabbro M, Sohn WJ, et al. Role of extracellular DNA in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27: e20180699. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0699.
23. Putzer B, Zilm P, Ratnayake J, Cathro P. Comparative efficacy of endodontic medicaments and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Aust Dent J. 2018;63(2):208-216. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12580.
24. Dioguardi M, Gioia GD, Illuzzi G, Laneve E, Cocco A, Troiano G. Endodontic irrigants: Different methods to improve efficacy and related problems. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(3):459-466. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_56_18.
25. Dioguardi M, Di Gioia G, Illuzzi G, Arena C, Caponio VCA, Caloro GA, et al. Inspection of the microbiota in endodontic lesions. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(2):47. DOI: 10.3390/dj7020047.
26. Vasudeva A, Sinha DJ, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Garg P, Upadhyay D. Disinfection of dentinal tubules with 2% Chlorhexidine gel, Calcium hydroxide and herbal intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro study. Singapore Dent J. 2017;38:39-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdj.2017.06.001.
27. Rodrigues CT, de Andrade FB, de Vasconcelos LRSM, Midena RZ, Pereira TC, Kuga MC, et al. Antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm and infected dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 2018;51(8):901-911. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12904.
28. Sohrabi K, Sooratgar A, Zolfagharnasab K, Kharazifard MJ, Afkhami F. Antibacterial activity of diode laser and sodium hypochlorite in Enterococcus faecalis-contaminated root canals. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(1):8-12. DOI: 10.7508/iej.2016.01.002.
29. Morales A. Penetración Dentinaria in vitro del Hipoclorito de Sodio a Diferentes Concentraciones con las Técnicas de Irrigación Convencional y Ultrasónica Pasiva. Int. J. Odontostomat. [Internet]. 2017; 11( 3 ): 305-309.
30. Taneja S, Kumari M, Barua M, Dudeja C, Malik M. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(1):67-71. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.156813.
31. Plotino G, Grande NM, Sorci E, Malagnino VA, Somma F. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39(9):716-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01142.x.
32. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39(3):196-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x.
33. Bürklein S, Hiller C, Huda M, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2011;44(5):447-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01850.x.
34. Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, Ferreira NS, Endo MS, Freitas LF, Camões IC. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. J Endod. 2014;40(5):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.006.
35. Krajczár K, et al. Chemomechanical preparation by hand instrumentation and by Mtwo engine-driven rotary files, an ex vivo study. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.2012: 4(3):e146.
36. Özsezer E, Kalyoncuoğlu E, Duran E, Yılmaz A, Tanrıverdi Y. Efficacy of different instrumentation techniques on reducing Enterococcus faecalis infection in experimentally infected root canals. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014;9(1): 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.03.024.
Publicado
2021-02-18
Cómo citar
Corrales Payares, C., Osorio Cabarcas, G., Lozano Deluquez, M., Zarate Toncel, P., Ramos Garrido, R., & Orozco Páez, J. (2021). Efectividad del sistema rotatorio Mtwo® e hipoclorito de sodio en la eliminación del Enterococcus faecalis. Revisión de la literatura. Ustasalud, 20, 43-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v20i0.2536
Número
Sección
Artículos de Revisión
