Security measure, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, SARS-CoV-2, Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v22i2.2988Keywords:
Compliance and Adherence to treatment, Safety measures, Sars-CoV-2, studentsAbstract
Objective: Establish the main behaviors and characteristics that affected adherence to the measures established to reduce the impact of Covid-19.
Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional analytical observational study, 530 university students from different universities in Bucaramanga and its metropolitan area were evaluated through snowball sampling. Sociodemographic variables and the designed and validated adherence questionnaire were evaluated, which includes 13 questions (maximum sum 39 and minimum 0 with response options on a 4-option Likert scale) and 3 questions about face masks. The cut-off point for good adherence was the mean plus one standard deviation (30 points). The research is classified as risk-free according to resolution 008430. The data were analyzed with linear regression in STATA 14.
Results: Among those evaluated, 64.5% were women, 83.3% studied at a private university and the average age was 20.7 with SD 4.0. Compliance with the main effective measures to control the transmission of the SARS-Cov2 virus is evident. However, a small percentage never applied them. Women have greater adherence to the measures. The R2 is observed to be 0.035 and P=0.0008. Where being a woman implies 1.8 points more in adherence score. The average of the adherence questionnaire was 24.96 with SD 5.36 points and there is a negative correlation -0.0489 between age and score.
Conclusions: Being a woman and attending a health school at a private university implies greater adherence to the measures.
Downloads
References
2. Wang TT, Moon HS, Le A, Carrasco LR, Panchal N. Proceedings from the OMS Resurgence Conference for resuming clinical practice after COVID-19 in the USA. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(12):1655-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.014
3. Block R, Jr., Berg A, Lennon RP, Miller EL, Nunez-Smith M. African American Adherence to COVID-19 Public Health Recommendations. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020;4(3):e166-e70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20200707-01
4. Ministerio de Salud de la República de Colombia. Resolución 8430 de 1993: Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud; 1993.
5. Steens A, Freiesleben de Blasio B, Veneti L, Gimma A, Edmunds WJ, Van Zandvoort K, et al. Poor self-reported adherence to COVID-19-related quarantine/isolation requests, Norway, April to July 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(37). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.37.20016075
6. Romero-Saritama, José Miguel, Simaluiza, Janneth, & Fernandez, Heriberto. Medidas de prevención para evitar el contagio por la COVID-19: de lo cotidiano a lo técnico-científico. Revista Española de Salud Pública. 2021; 95, e202104051. URL: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57272021000100188&lng=es&tlng=es.
7. Al-Hasan A, Khuntia J, Yim D. Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e23019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/23019
8. García-Alamino J. M. Aspectos epidemiológicos, clínica y mecanismos de control de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2: situación en España [Epidemiological aspects, clinic and control mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Situation in Spain]. Enfermeria clinica (English Edition). 2021; 31, S4–S11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.05.001
9. Johnson AA, Wallace BK, Xu Q, Chihuri S, Hoven CW, Susser ES, et al. Hopelessness in New York State Physicians During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022;34(1):152-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000808
10. Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Ahmed N, Adnan S, Aftab M, Zafar MS, et al. Fear and Practice Modifications among Dentists to Combat Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082821
11. Domínguez, R., Zelaya, S., Gutiérrez, M., & Castellanos, E. Medidas de protección en personal de salud para disminución de riesgo de contagio de COVID-19. Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Salud. 2020. 16 p. URL: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2020/08/1087768/medidas-de-proteccion-de-bioseguridad-p-de-salud-17ago20.pdf
12. Zangoue M, Safari H, Royce SG, Zangooie A, Rezapour H, Zangouei A, et al. The high level of adherence to personal protective equipment in health care workers efficiently protects them from COVID-19 infection. Work. 2021;69(4):1191-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210634
13. Barahmand U, Mohamadpour S, Sheikh Ahmad RH. COVID-19 Related Stresses, Conspiracy Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Non-adherence to Safety Guidelines. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023;15(2):22-33. Published 2023 Mar 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5367
14. Hoyos-Hernández, Paula Andrea, Concha Valderrama, Vanessa, Valderrama Orbegozo, Laura Juliana, Díaz Mutis, Juan David y Tovar Cuevas, José Rafael. Adherencia a las conductas preventivas de la COVID-19 en mujeres trans colombianas. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 2021; 53, 190-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.21
15. Chen SC, Hong Nguyen NT, Lin CY, et al. Digital health literacy and well-being among university students: Mediating roles of fear of COVID-19, information satisfaction, and internet information search. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231165970. Published 2023 Mar 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231165970
