Frequency of apical periodontitis in teeth with endodontic treatment by volumetric computed tomography in a subpopulation of Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v21i2.2702

Keywords:

Root canal therapy, Periapical periodontitis, Tooth apex, Root canal obturation, Cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

Introduction: Radiographic interpretation is a highly subjective but essential component for the diagnosis of apical periodontitis, periapical radiographs could underestimate the identification when they are small, which could generate false negatives. On the other hand, volumetric computed tomography has greater sensitivity to identify and measure subtle periapical lesions.

Objective: To determine the frequency of apical periodontitis using cone beam computed tomography images in a Colombian subpopulation.

Methods: A total of 318 teeth and roots with adequate endodontic treatments were included in this study and evaluated by cone beam computed tomography with voxel size of 0.2 mm. The widest area of apical radiolucency in each tooth root was measured and a score was assigned based on the endodontic radiolucency index; the evaluation was carried out by two endodontist and a radiologist. Frequencies and percentages were used for statistical analysis.

Results: 60.37% of the teeth and roots were considered healthy, while 39.63% of the remaining roots presented apical periodontitis.

Conclusion: The frequency of AP in the teeth and roots studied and that presented adequate endodontic treatment was 39.63% and the size of the periapical lesions varied between >0.5 and 2.5 mm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Uriel Mesa Herrera, 3D Imagen Digital

Odontólogo. Especialista en Radiología, 3D Imagen Digital. Colombia

Bibiana Yorley Blanco Fuentes, Universidad Santo Tomás

Odontóloga. Magíster en Ciencias Odontológicas, Universidad Santo Tomás. Colombia

Jaime Omar Moreno Monsalve, Universidad Santo Tomás

Odontólogo. PhD en Odontología, Universidad Santo Tomás. Colombia.

References

1. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J. 2021 Dec 27. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34958494.

2. Jakovljevic A, Nikolic N, Jacimovic J, et al. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and conventional nonsurgical root canal treatment in general adult population: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies published between 2012 and 2020. J Endod. 2020;46(10):1371-1386. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.007

3. di Filippo G, Sidhu SK, Chong BS. Apical periodontitis and the technical quality of root canal treatment in an adult sub-population in London. Br Dent J. 2014;216(10):E22. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.404

4. Song M, Park M, Lee CY, Kim E. Periapical status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings in a Korean population. J Endod. 2014;40(2):182-186. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.017

5. Moreno JO, Alves FRF, Gonçalves LS, Martinez AM, Rôças I. Periradicular status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations in an urban Colombian population. J Endod. 2013;39(5):600-604. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.020

6. Vengerfeldt V, Mändar R, Nguyen MS, Saukas S, Saag M. Apical periodontitis in southern Estonian population: prevalence and associations with quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations. BMC oral health. 2017;17(1):147. doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0429-7

7. Kersten HW, Wesselink PR, Thoden Van Velzen SK. The diagnostic reliability of the buccai radiograph after root canal filling. Int Endod J. 1987;20(1):20-24. Accessed November 17, 2021. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00583.x

8. Khanna AB. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Evid Based Endod. 2020;5(1). doi:10.1186/s41121-020-00020-4

9. Wu MK, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR. Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment. Int Endod J. 2009;42(8):656-666. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01600.x

10. Torabinejad M, Rice DD, Maktabi O, Oyoyo U, Abramovitch K. Prevalence and size of periapical radiolucencies using cone-beam computed tomography in teeth without apparent Intraoral radiographic lesions: a new periapical index with a clinical recommendation. J Endod. 2018;44(3):389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.015

11. Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in detecting small periapical lesions. J Endod. 2012;38(7):965-970. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.001

12. Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P. A Comparative investigation of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod. 2014;40(3):360-365. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.003

13. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Evar Kraft DC, Væth M, Kirkevang LL. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography used for assessment of apical periodontitis: an ex vivo histopathological study on human cadavers. Int Endod J. 2019;52(4):439-450. doi:10.1111/iej.13020

14. de Sousa Gomide Guimarães MRF, Samuel RO, Guimarães G, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between obturation length and presence of apical periodontitis by CBCT: an observational cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. Published online 2018:1-6. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2623-7

15. Gudac J, Hellén-Halme K, Machiulskiene V. Prognostic validity of the periapical and endodontic status scale for the radiographically assessed 2-year treatment outcomes in teeth with apical periodontitis: a prospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01723-9

16. Ng Y ‐L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2008;41(12):1026-1046. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01484.x

Published

2022-01-28

How to Cite

Mesa Herrera, U., Blanco Fuentes, B. Y., & Moreno Monsalve, J. O. (2022). Frequency of apical periodontitis in teeth with endodontic treatment by volumetric computed tomography in a subpopulation of Colombia. Ustasalud, 21(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v21i2.2702

Issue

Section

Scientific and technological research papers