Ética en la investigación científica; más allá de normativas e indicadores
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v21i1.2637Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] Gregory RL. The public perception of science. Perception. 1986; 15: 231-233.
[2] Cortina A. Política, ética y religión. 2.ª ed. Madrid: Trotta; 2005.
[3] Fanelli D. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4 (5): e5738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
[4] Office of Science and Technology Policy. Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register. 2000; 65 (235): 76260–76264.
[5] Beck U. La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. 2. Beck U. La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. 1.ª ed. Barcelona: Paidós; 1998.
[6] Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. Disponible en: https://www.wcrif.org/documents/327-singapore-statement-a4size/file. 2010.
[7] Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. Disponible en: https://wcrif.org/documents/354-montreal-statement-english/file. 2013.
[8] Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18 (7), e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
[9] Mair D, Smillie L, La Placa G, Schwendinger F, Raykovska M, Pasztor Z and Van Bavel R. Understanding our Political Nature: How to put knowledge and reason at the heart of political decision-making.1.ª ed. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019.
[10] Sagan C. El mundo y sus demonios. La ciencia como una luz en la oscuridad. 1.ª ed. Barcelona: Planeta;1997.
[11] Foucault M. El poder, una bestia magnífica: sobre el poder, la prisión y la vida. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 2012.
[12] Mejlgaard N, Bouter LM, Gaskell G, Kavouras P, Allum N, Bendtsen AK, et al. Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature. 2020;586(7829):358-360. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8.
[13] Bouter L. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020; 26, 2363–2369. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5
[14] Resnik DB, Elliott KC. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2019; 75,1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.12.011
[2] Cortina A. Política, ética y religión. 2.ª ed. Madrid: Trotta; 2005.
[3] Fanelli D. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4 (5): e5738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
[4] Office of Science and Technology Policy. Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register. 2000; 65 (235): 76260–76264.
[5] Beck U. La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. 2. Beck U. La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. 1.ª ed. Barcelona: Paidós; 1998.
[6] Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. Disponible en: https://www.wcrif.org/documents/327-singapore-statement-a4size/file. 2010.
[7] Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. Disponible en: https://wcrif.org/documents/354-montreal-statement-english/file. 2013.
[8] Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18 (7), e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
[9] Mair D, Smillie L, La Placa G, Schwendinger F, Raykovska M, Pasztor Z and Van Bavel R. Understanding our Political Nature: How to put knowledge and reason at the heart of political decision-making.1.ª ed. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019.
[10] Sagan C. El mundo y sus demonios. La ciencia como una luz en la oscuridad. 1.ª ed. Barcelona: Planeta;1997.
[11] Foucault M. El poder, una bestia magnífica: sobre el poder, la prisión y la vida. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 2012.
[12] Mejlgaard N, Bouter LM, Gaskell G, Kavouras P, Allum N, Bendtsen AK, et al. Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature. 2020;586(7829):358-360. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8.
[13] Bouter L. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020; 26, 2363–2369. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5
[14] Resnik DB, Elliott KC. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2019; 75,1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.12.011
Downloads
Published
2021-12-15
How to Cite
Florez Salamanca, E. J., & Florez Hernández, S. B. (2021). Ética en la investigación científica; más allá de normativas e indicadores. Ustasalud, 21(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v21i1.2637
Issue
Section
Editorial
