MARGINAL DISCREPANCY OF ZIRCONIUM OXIDE COPINGS MADE WITH TWO CAD/CAM SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v8i1.1176Keywords:
Marginal discrepancy, CAD/CAM, Crowns all ceramics, Preparation in chamfer, Marginal fitAbstract
Purpose: To compare the marginal discrepancy of copings made in zirconium oxide with two systems CAD/CAM.Methods: In vitro marginal discrepancies of two systems CAD/CAM (Procera® and Everest®) for ceramic copings and a control group of gold copings were evaluated and compared. A first one human premolar superior was prepared, duplicate 30 times and divided in three groups. Ten copings by group were made. The measurements of marginal discrepancy were made on the natural tooth, on 20 points distributed randomly around the margin preparation. A 3D microscope video was used with magnification of 200X. Values of average and standard deviation were calculated for the marginal openings. The data were analyzed with analysis of variance of a route ANOVA.
Results: mean of the marginal discrepancies and standard deviations of the copings were 29±8.6 um for the control group, 22,31±14.6um for Everest® and 21.55±6.9um for Procera®. Significant differences were not found between the copings of the three groups (P> 0.05).
Conclusions: The marginal discrepancies were all within the clinically acceptable standard set at 50-100mm, However, Procera® and Everest® systems showed the smallest marginal discrepancies compared with the copings made in an alloy of medium gold content.
Downloads
References
Willer J, Rossbach A, Weber HP. Computer-assisted milling of dental restorations using a new CAD/CAM data acquisition system. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 346-353.
Felton DA, Kanoy BE. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 357-364.
Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 582 -593.
Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 441-447.
Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 459-464.
Stoll R, Fischer C, Springer M, Stachniss V. Marginal adaptation of partial crowns cast in pure titanium and in gold allows. An in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 1-6.
Ayad MF. Compositional stability and marginal accuracy of complete cast crowns made with as-received and recast type III gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:162-166.
Klaus W. Boening, Burkhard H. Wolf, Annette E. Schmidt. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 419-424.
Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium coping fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 47-52.
Okutan M, Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 827-832.
May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera all ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 394-404.
Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machinemilledTitanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 440-447.
Schaerer P, Sato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 534-542.
Oruc S, Tulunoglu Y. Fit of titanium and a base metal alloy metal-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 314 -318.
Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 129-134.
Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 40-49.
Conrad J. Heather, Wook – Jin Seong. Current ceramic materials and Systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 389-404.
Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Naumann M. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 814-820.
Vigolo P, Fonzi F. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 621-626.
Papazoglou E, Brantley WA, Johnston WM, Carr AB. Effects of dental laboratory processing variables and in vitro testing medium on the porcelain adherence of high-palladium casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 514-519.
Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM System. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 367-374.
Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In –Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crows. Int J Prosthodontic 1997; 10: 478-484.
Rinke S, Hüls A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995, 8: 303-310.
Naert I, Van Der Donck A. Precision of fit and clinical evaluation of all-ceramic full restorations followed between 0.5 and 5 years. J Oral Rehabil 2005 32; 51-57.
Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 583-590.
