Value or demolish modern heritage: the case of ESSO Colombian S.A. building in Bogotá, Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/rev.m.v19i2.2840Keywords:
Architectural heritage, Real Estate of Cultural Interest (BIC), Urban renewal, Modernity, Esso colombiana S.A.Abstract
There is much talk about the urgency of safeguarding the city's heritage, while Planes de Renovación Parcial are submited for approval by the Secretaría de Planeación Distrital, which sometimes contradict this urgency which undobutedly should lead to the respective issuing of the declaration as Bien de Interés Cultural BIC. This is the case of the Plan Parcial de Renovación Urbana CAR-Universidad Libre, which appears marked with Viability on the website of the Secretaría distrital de Planeación which contains, within its intervention area, two essential buildings for the architectural memory of Bogotá. One of them, Pan American (Teusacá Building), fortunately already has a BIC declaration. The other, the Esso Colombiana Building, hasn't obtained it yet. This text refers to and particularizes this building from a review in context, originated in an investigative exercise carried out by the author about Ignacio Martínez Cárdenas and his professional practice. The research is developed from the following question: ¿What is the argument to evade that responsibility that we have to protect as connoisseurs of what this building means, implies and represents, in that location and with that evident formal, aesthetic, conceptual and material statement, still manifests today in this particular building?
Downloads
References
Arango, S y Carrasco, F. (2016) Asociación pro-rescate de archivos de arquitectura, APRAA.
Archivo de Bogotá. (2020) Fondo de la Firma Martínez Cárdenas & Cía. Ltda.
Botti, Giaime y Jorge Francisco Liernur. “De la excelencia al olvido. Sobre la emergencia y la desaparición de dos décadas de arquitectura en Colombia”. Dearq nº. 29 (2021): 20-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq29.2021.03
Consejo distrital de Patrimonio Cultural CDPC. Sesión ordinaria. Acta no. 8 de 21 de agosto de 2019. https://idpc.gov.co/Consejo-distrital-de-Patrimonio/Acta%20CDPC%20Sesi%C3%B3n%2008%20del%2021%20de%20agosto%202019.pdf
Edificio ESSO Bogotá. (1957) Revista Proa. Edición de octubre, Número ciento trece (113)
Largacha, J.I. (2020) https://co.linkedin.com/in/jos%C3%A9-ignacio-largacha-martinez/es
Largacha, M.O. (2020) Colección Fílmica Ignacio Martínez Cárdenas. (2020) https://coleccionfilmicaimc.com.co Colección Fílmica IMC, Beca de Gestión del Patrimonio Fílmico colombiano, Ministerio de Cultura.
Lewis Mumford. National Review. Sept 3, 1990, Vol. 42 Issue 17, p15, 2 p.
Modern Architecture: International Exhibition, New York, Feb. 10 to March 23, 1932, Museum of Modern Art MoMA. https://www.moma.org/documents/moma_catalogue_2044_300061855.pdf?_ga=2.201308077.2090046631.1668531034-1417309780.1668531034
Mondragón, H. (2008) Arquitectura en Colombia 1946–1951, lecturas críticas de la revista Proa. DEARQ. Revista Uniandes. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq2.2008.10
Reina Mendoza, S. (2022) Coser con un río. El Parque Nacional Olaya Herrera.
Repositorio normativo Archivo General de la Nación. Decreto 1080 de 2015.
Revista informes de la construcción Vol. 9 1989 © Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Licencia Creative Commons 3.0 España (CC-by)http://informesdelaconstruccion.revistas.csic.es
Rodríguez, R. (2016) ¿Qué le pasaba a la Arquitectura Moderna? Reflexiones de un simposio de 1948 Estoa N° 9 / Vol. 5 / Julio – Diciembre 2016 ISSN: 1390-7263 e-ISSN: 1390-9274 DOI: 10.18537/est.v005.n009.08
Secretaría Distrital de Planeación. Documento Técnico de soporte, anexo patrimonial, PPRU Car- universidad Libre Plan Parcial CAR-Universidad Libre. https://www.sdp.gov.co/gestion-territorial/planes-parciales-de-renovacion-urbana/planes/plan-parcial-de-renovacion-urbana-car-universidad-libre
Villota Peña, J. (2014) The hyper americans! Modern architecture in Venezuela during the 1950s. Dissertation.




