This is an outdated version published on 2026-04-21. Read the most recent version.

The co-production of the biobank object: law and biomedical technoscience

Authors

  • Diego Hernando Hernández Velásquez Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15332/iust.v24i28.3320

Keywords:

Biobank, Co-production, Epistemological sovereignty, Dialogic governance

Abstract

Colombian law is part of the States that have decided to draft a specific regulatory framework for the regulation of biobanks in biomedical, biotechnological, and epidemiological research. However, biobanks are “objects” that have already been defined, used, and assembled into identities, institutions, discourses, and representations from other areas of social and scientific knowledge. In the technoscientific world, law does not have the only word. For this purpose, this article proposes a co-productive dialogue between what law imagines a biobank should be, in a Global South State, and what social studies of science and technology (STS) describe, as well as the care that a normative or prescriptive epistemology like law should take with quality practices, standardization, and normalization of processes, typical of business administration and industrial engineering, which compete with law regarding how to govern the biobanks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Diego Hernando Hernández Velásquez, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

Abogado, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Especialista en Contratación Estatal, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. Magíster en Hermenéutica Jurídica y Derecho, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Profesor de carrera e investigador, Escuela de Derecho y Ciencia Política, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

References

Argudo Portal, V. (2021). Biomedicina en proceso de elaboración: un estudio cualitativo sobre los biobancos como infraestructuras para la investigación biomédica [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. https://tesisenred.net/handle/10803/674032

Cárdenas Suárez, D. M., y Torres Amado, J. (2023). Caja de herramientas para la conformación de un biobanco a partir de los lineamientos de la ISO 20387 en un centro de investigación en salud de Colombia [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Santo Tomás]. https://repository.usta.edu.co/

Garden, H., Hawkins, N., & Winickoff, D. (2021). Building and sustaining collaborative platforms in genomics and biobanks for health innovation. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/03/building-and-sustaining-collaborative-platforms-in-genomics-and-biobanks-for-health-innovation_13abb85e/11d960b7-en.pdf

Gunturiz Albarracín, M. L. (2023, 18 de abril). Biobancos en Colombia [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSjxSHSbOgY

Jasanoff, S. (1995). Science at the bar: Law, science, and technology in America. Harvard University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge.

Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2011). Reframing rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the genetic age. MIT Press.

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2016). The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. W. W. Norton.

Jasanoff, S. (2019). Can science make sense of life? John Wiley & Sons.

Karastergiou, A. (2024). Bio-objectification and biobanks. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2024-0005

Lemke, T. (2011). Introducción a la biopolítica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Loft, S., & Poulsen, H. E. (1996). Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 74(5), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207507

Luna-González, M., Guío-Mahecha, E., Becerra-Bayona, S., y Serrano-Díaz, N. (2016). La gestión de los datos, un proceso esencial para el desarrollo del biobanco. Salud UIS, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v48n4-2016013

Santamaría Echeverría, E., Gunturiz Albarracín, M. L., y Castro Osorio, C. M. (2024). Sostenibilidad financiera de los biobancos en Colombia: alternativas jurídicas y éticas. Revista de Derecho Privado, (47), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.47.02

Serrano Díaz, N. C., Guío Mahecha, E., Páez Leal, M. C., Luna González, M. L., Corzo Prada, L. E., y Becerra Bayona, S. (2016). Control de calidad del material biológico humano recolectado con fines de investigación. Salud UIS, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v48n3-2016013

Valdés, E. (2021). Biolaw: Origins, doctrine and juridical applications on the biosciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71823-7

Vallès-Peris, N., Argudo-Portal, V., y Domènech, M. (2022). Manufacturing Life, What Life? Ethical Debates Around Biobanks and Social Robots. NanoEthics, 16, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00390-y

Published

2026-04-21

Versions

How to Cite

Hernández Velásquez, D. H. (2026). The co-production of the biobank object: law and biomedical technoscience. IUSTITIA, 24(28). https://doi.org/10.15332/iust.v24i28.3320

Issue

Section

Accepted for Publication