A new approach to the quality price concept in the Colombian public contrating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/iust.v0i22.3039Keywords:
Price-quality, efficiency, state entities, European Union, public procurement, public policiesAbstract
This article aims to make an approach to a new concept on the quality/price relationship in our public procurement system, using as reference the high courts of the European Union, Colombian legislation and the doctrine that allows us to put a perspective from the procurement public, integrating the most important principles of our public and contractual administration and why they necessarily affect the provision of public goods and services.
Colombian law 1150 of 2007, in its fifth article, determined that in the selection process in which technical and economic factors are taken into account, the offer will be more advantageous if it complies with these three concepts: a) the elements of quality- price supported by scores or formulas written in the contract conditions chapter; or b) the quality-price weighting elements that represent the best cost-benefit ratio for the entity.
This previous concept implies a threat to the link to the process of interpretation of the principle of good administration because the qualitative aspects that make up the contract must necessarily be considered from the point of view of performance and value.
This way of thinking about public procurement is being contrasted with the European Union model, in which the principle of efficiency is applied, seeking better quality without seeking only the lowest price, putting as a priority the achievement of the needs of the public. contributors to public contracts and public policies, establishing clear and relatively high quality standards that contractors must achieve to aspire to the contract
Downloads
References
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/contracts
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/contracts
https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I2ef1290d1ed511e38578f7ccc38dcbee/Public-procurement-in-the-United-States-overview?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&viewType=FullText
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/government_contracts
https://www.oecd.org/gov/public-procurement/OCDE-Recomendacion-sobre-Contratacion-Publica-ES.pdf
Consejo de estado. Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Sección tercera. Proceso 36.476 (M.P. Jaime E. Rodríguez Navas; 7 de julio de 2008).
Tribunal constitucional de España (2022). STC 76/2022. Junio 15 2022
Gimeno Feliú, J. M. (2020). La visión estratégica en la contratación pública en la LCSP: hacia una contratación socialmente responsable y de calidad (No. ART-2020-120348).
(Cerrillo I. Martínez “prólogo”, la gobernanza hoy: 10 textos de referencia. Instituto nacional de administración pública, Madrid, 2005. P. 10.)
Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. B. (2020). Management fundamentals. Columbia University Press.
Romero Molina Cesar Augusto, conferencia dictada en el master de la contratación pública 2020-UCLM, Cuenca, España
3 PONCE SOLÉ, J., Deber de buena administración y derecho al procedimiento administrativo debido, Lex Nova, Valladolid, 2001.
Romero Molina, César A.; Moreno Molina, Jose Antonio. Principios de la contratación pública en la jurisprudencia. Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea-Consejo de Estado Colombiano. Editorial Jurídica Ibañez-2015
Colombia. Consejo de Estado. Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Sección Tercera. Noviembre 13 de 2013. Expediente 1999-02430-01-23829. C.P. Hernán Andrade Rincón.
https://www.sic.gov.co/sites/default/files/estados/082018/RESOLUCION-4604-SEGURIDAD-PRIVADA.pdf
Romero Molina, C. A. (2021). Rendición de cuentas en la contratación pública colombiana. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho De México, 71(281-2), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.22201/fder.24488933e.2021.281-2.81170
Rusinque, I. A. R. (2014). Menor Valor: Oferta Mas Favorable. Rev. Digital de Derecho Admin., 11, 209.
Gimeno Feliú, J. M. (2021). La calidad en la contratación pública como nuevo paradigma. El contexto de los fondos europeos como elemento para el bing bang
Tribunal Constitucional Español. STC 100 de 2020, FJ 3.
Alter (2015) recomendación del consejo sobre contratación pública. OCDE