Influential Factors in the Allocation of Aid to Football Players: Performance or Social Situation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/iust.v0i21.2904Keywords:
Experimental economics, Distributive justice, Sports performance, Social characteristics, Decision makingAbstract
This article will identify, from an experiment, the influence of distributive motivations in soccer coaches when assigning financial aid to players on their team. The results show that coaches are influenced by a selection bias attributed to ideas of distributive justice that they value together with sports performance. So not only important objective variables, such as sports performance, but also socioeconomic characteristics or living conditions such as overcrowding (number of people in the household), type of housing, neighborhood, academic level, and access to health services that do the player have. Providing a path to study decision-making in the selection processes of young talents for sport. The paper is divided into four sections. First, the introduction and background are presented. The second section explains the methodology of the experiment. Third, the results are presented. In the fourth section, there is a discussion of these results and the conclusions. Finally, in the fifth section are the references.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barrére; M. (2002). La acción positiva: Análisis del concepto y propuesta de revisión. Jornadas sobre “Políticas locales para la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres”; Palacios de Congresos Europa; Victoria-Gasteiz, diciembre del 2002. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Brañas; P. (2011). Economía experimental y del comportamiento. Universidad de Granada. Antoni Bosch editor, S.A, ISBN: 978-84-95348-75-3.
Brañas; P. (2006). Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Volume 60, Issue 3, July 2006, Pages 306-320.
Bolton; G; Katok; E; Zwick; R. (1998). Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory 27, 269–299.
Castellanos; S. (2008). Preferencias sociales en la asignación de recursos a desplazados y excombatientes: una aproximación al caso colombiano desde la economía experimental. Coyuntura Social No. 38, junio y diciembre de 2008, pp. 233-260. Fedesarrollo, Bogotá - Colombia.
Cárdenas; J; Carpenter; J. (2008). Behavioral Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World. The Journal of Development Studies, 44: 3, 311-338, DOI: 10.1080 / 00220380701848327.
Cárdenas; J; Candelo; N; Gaviria; A; Seth; Rajiv. (2008). Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study. Discrimination in Latin America: An Economic Perspective (2008). The World Bank.
Carpenter; J; Seki; E. (2011). Do Social Preferences Increase Productivity? Field Experimental Evidence from Fishermen in Toyama Bay. Economy Inquiry Volume 49 Number 2.
Camerer; C; Lovallo; D. (1999). Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306-318. Retrieved June 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/116990
Cochard; F; Le Gallo; J; Georgantzis; N; Tisserand; J. (2021). Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2021, vol. 90, pp. 101613.
Dworkin; R. (1980). ¿Es la riqueza un valor? The Journal of Legal Studies 9: 191-226.
Frohlich; N; Oppenheimer; J; Moore; J. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator games: the cost of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46, 250–271.
Hayek; F. (1960). Los fundamentos de la Libertad. University of Chicago Press.
Henrich; J. (2000). Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. The American Economic Review Vol. 90, No. 4 (sep., 2000).
Hoffman; E; Mccabe; K; Smith; V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 653–660.
Jara-Labarthé; V. (2018). Discursos y prácticas de la discriminación positiva para políticas indígenas en educación superior. Cinta de moebio, (63), 331-342. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300331
Leal; A; van Dijk; E. (2021). People from lower social classes elicit greater prosociality: Compassion and deservingness matter. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 1064–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982072
North; D. (2005). Entendiendo el proceso de cambio económico. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Palacio; L; Parra; D. (2005). ¡Tómelo o déjelo! Evidencia experimental sobre racionalidad, preferencias sociales y negociación. Lecturas de Economía - No. 82. Medellín, enero-junio 2015.
Poli; R; Ravenel; L; Roger Besson; R. (2022). Exportación de futbolistas: 2017-2022. Informe Mensual del Observatorio del Fútbol CIES n°75 - mayo 2022.
Rawls; J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971.
Roemer; J. (1998). Igualdad de oportunidades. Isegoría, (18), 71–87.
Ruiz; V. (2017). La naturaleza de los derechos: el debate Dworkin-Posner. Universidad de los Andes.
Sánchez; M. (2018). La Fábrica de la Grandeza, análisis de las divisiones menores del Atlético Nacional de Colombia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Salgado; M. (2022). Altruismo y fundamentos morales en adolescentes: Un estudio experimental. Revista de Sociología, 37(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-529X.2022.68151
Salgado; M; Vásquez; A; Yáñez; A. (2019). Do young people adapt their prosocial behavior to that of their peers? An experimental exploration. Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419840028
Serrano; E. (2005). La teoría aristotélica de la justicia. Isonomía, (22), 123-160. Recuperado el 18 de mayo de 2022, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-02182005000100006&lng=es&tlng=es
Sen; A. (2009). The Idea of Justice, Londres, Penguin.
Smith; V. (2005). Racionalidad constructivista y ecológica en economía. RAE: Revista Asturiana de Economía, ISSN 1134-8291, Nº. 32, 2005, págs. 197-273.
Smith; V. (1994). Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1): 113-131.
Thunström L; Cherry TL; McEvoy DM; Shogren JF. (2016). Contexto endógeno en un juego de dictador. Revista de economía conductual y experimental, 65, 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.08.001
Zelenski; J; Rusting; C; Larsen, R. (2003). Consistency in the time of experiment participation and personality correlates: a methodological note. Personality and Individual Differences Volume 34, Issue 4, March 2003, Pages 547-558.
Brañas; P. (2011). Economía experimental y del comportamiento. Universidad de Granada. Antoni Bosch editor, S.A, ISBN: 978-84-95348-75-3.
Brañas; P. (2006). Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Volume 60, Issue 3, July 2006, Pages 306-320.
Bolton; G; Katok; E; Zwick; R. (1998). Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory 27, 269–299.
Castellanos; S. (2008). Preferencias sociales en la asignación de recursos a desplazados y excombatientes: una aproximación al caso colombiano desde la economía experimental. Coyuntura Social No. 38, junio y diciembre de 2008, pp. 233-260. Fedesarrollo, Bogotá - Colombia.
Cárdenas; J; Carpenter; J. (2008). Behavioral Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World. The Journal of Development Studies, 44: 3, 311-338, DOI: 10.1080 / 00220380701848327.
Cárdenas; J; Candelo; N; Gaviria; A; Seth; Rajiv. (2008). Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study. Discrimination in Latin America: An Economic Perspective (2008). The World Bank.
Carpenter; J; Seki; E. (2011). Do Social Preferences Increase Productivity? Field Experimental Evidence from Fishermen in Toyama Bay. Economy Inquiry Volume 49 Number 2.
Camerer; C; Lovallo; D. (1999). Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306-318. Retrieved June 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/116990
Cochard; F; Le Gallo; J; Georgantzis; N; Tisserand; J. (2021). Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2021, vol. 90, pp. 101613.
Dworkin; R. (1980). ¿Es la riqueza un valor? The Journal of Legal Studies 9: 191-226.
Frohlich; N; Oppenheimer; J; Moore; J. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator games: the cost of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46, 250–271.
Hayek; F. (1960). Los fundamentos de la Libertad. University of Chicago Press.
Henrich; J. (2000). Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. The American Economic Review Vol. 90, No. 4 (sep., 2000).
Hoffman; E; Mccabe; K; Smith; V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 653–660.
Jara-Labarthé; V. (2018). Discursos y prácticas de la discriminación positiva para políticas indígenas en educación superior. Cinta de moebio, (63), 331-342. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300331
Leal; A; van Dijk; E. (2021). People from lower social classes elicit greater prosociality: Compassion and deservingness matter. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 1064–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982072
North; D. (2005). Entendiendo el proceso de cambio económico. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Palacio; L; Parra; D. (2005). ¡Tómelo o déjelo! Evidencia experimental sobre racionalidad, preferencias sociales y negociación. Lecturas de Economía - No. 82. Medellín, enero-junio 2015.
Poli; R; Ravenel; L; Roger Besson; R. (2022). Exportación de futbolistas: 2017-2022. Informe Mensual del Observatorio del Fútbol CIES n°75 - mayo 2022.
Rawls; J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971.
Roemer; J. (1998). Igualdad de oportunidades. Isegoría, (18), 71–87.
Ruiz; V. (2017). La naturaleza de los derechos: el debate Dworkin-Posner. Universidad de los Andes.
Sánchez; M. (2018). La Fábrica de la Grandeza, análisis de las divisiones menores del Atlético Nacional de Colombia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Salgado; M. (2022). Altruismo y fundamentos morales en adolescentes: Un estudio experimental. Revista de Sociología, 37(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-529X.2022.68151
Salgado; M; Vásquez; A; Yáñez; A. (2019). Do young people adapt their prosocial behavior to that of their peers? An experimental exploration. Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419840028
Serrano; E. (2005). La teoría aristotélica de la justicia. Isonomía, (22), 123-160. Recuperado el 18 de mayo de 2022, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-02182005000100006&lng=es&tlng=es
Sen; A. (2009). The Idea of Justice, Londres, Penguin.
Smith; V. (2005). Racionalidad constructivista y ecológica en economía. RAE: Revista Asturiana de Economía, ISSN 1134-8291, Nº. 32, 2005, págs. 197-273.
Smith; V. (1994). Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1): 113-131.
Thunström L; Cherry TL; McEvoy DM; Shogren JF. (2016). Contexto endógeno en un juego de dictador. Revista de economía conductual y experimental, 65, 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.08.001
Zelenski; J; Rusting; C; Larsen, R. (2003). Consistency in the time of experiment participation and personality correlates: a methodological note. Personality and Individual Differences Volume 34, Issue 4, March 2003, Pages 547-558.
Downloads
Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
Osorio-Colonia, J. C., & Flórez-Pinilla, K. (2023). Influential Factors in the Allocation of Aid to Football Players: Performance or Social Situation. IUSTITIA, (21), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.15332/iust.v0i21.2904
Issue
Section
Investigación
