Ceniza de cáscara de coco como susituto del cemento: efecto de la temperatura de calcinación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/iteckne.v20i2.3006Palabras clave:
cascara de coco, resíduos agroindustriales, tratamiento térmico, propiedades mecánicas, análisis de costosResumen
La disposición de la cáscara de coco es un problema de eliminación de desechos en países donde la producción de coco es abundante. Cuando la cáscara de coco se calcina produce cenizas, las cuales son un material aglutinante potencial para preparar hormigón. En este trabajo se calcinó cáscara de coco a 400°C, 500°C y 600 °C durante 3 h. Las cenizas producidas se emplearon como sustituto del cemento. Las características de las cenizas se evaluaron por área superficial y DRX. El efecto de la sustitución de las cenizas como sustituto del cemento se evaluó mediante ensayos de trabajabilidad y resistencia mecánica. Los resultados experimentales demostraron que 600 °C es la temperatura de combustión más adecuada para la calcinación de la cascara, con presencia de SiO2 amorfo y baja superficial alta. Los resultados mostraron que, en contraste con el hormigón de referencia, la temperatura de combustión disminuye la trabajabilidad del concreto. Además, el aumento de la temperatura de calcinación de la cáscara de coco mejora la resistencia mecánica. La resistencia a compresión de la mezcla que incorporó cenizas de cáscara de coco calcinadas a 600 °C fue superior a las demás. Se encontró adicionalmente que esta temperatura era convincente considerando el costo de preparar las cenizas.
Descargas
Citas
[2] J. Pokorný, R. Ševčík, J. Šál, L. Fiala, L. Zárybnická, and L. Podolka, “Bio-based aggregate in the production of advanced thermal-insulating concrete with improved acoustic performance,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 358, no. March, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129436.
[3] K. Celik et al., “High-volume natural volcanic pozzolan and limestone powder as partial replacements for portland cement in self-compacting and sustainable concrete,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 45, pp. 136–147, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.003.
[4] W. Xing, V. W. Tam, K. N. Le, J. L. Hao, and J. Wang, “Life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete on its environmental impacts: A critical review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 317, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125950.
[5] S. A. Miller, G. Habert, R. J. Myers, and J. T. Harvey, “Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies,” One Earth, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1398–1411, 2021.doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011.
[6] S. A. Miller, A. Horvath, and P. J. M. Monteiro, “Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 11, no. 7, 2016. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029.
[7] A. Alsalman, L. N. Assi, R. S. Kareem, K. Carter, and P. Ziehl, “Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete,” Clean. Environ. Syst., vol. 3, no. April, p. 100047, 2021.doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100047.
[8] M. N. Amin, T. Murtaza, K. Shahzada, K. Khan, and M. Adil, “Pozzolanic potential and mechanical performance of wheat straw ash incorporated sustainable concrete,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2019. doi: 10.3390/su11020519.
[9] S. . Bangar, S. . Phalke, A. . Gawade, R. . Tambe, and A. . Rahane, “A review paper on replacement of cement with bagasse,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Manag., vol. 7, no. March, pp. 127–131, 2017.
[10] H. M. Hamada et al., “Sustainable use of palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary cementitious material: A comprehensive review,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 40, no. July 2020, p. 102286, 2021.doi: /10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102286.
[11] A. Siddika, M. A. Al Mamun, R. Alyousef, and H. Mohammadhosseini, “State-of-the-art-review on rice husk ash: A supplementary cementitious material in concrete,” J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 294–307, 2021.doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.10.006.
[12] S. Ali, U. Javed, and R. Arsalan, “Eco-friendly utilization of corncob ash as partial replacement of sand in concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 195, pp. 165–177, 2019.doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.063.
[13] S. Kumari and R. Walia, “Life cycle assessment of sustainable concrete by utilizing groundnut husk ash in concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 49, pp. 1910–1915, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.082.
[14] X. Li et al., “A systematic review of waste materials in cement-based composites for construction applications,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 45, no. July 2021, p. 103447, 2022. doi: /10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103447.
[15] R. Tomar, K. Kishore, H. Singh Parihar, and N. Gupta, “A comprehensive study of waste coconut shell aggregate as raw material in concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 44, pp. 437–443, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.754.
[16] H. Liu, Q. Li, and S. Ni, “Assessment of the engineering properties of biomass recycled aggregate concrete developed from coconut shells,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 342, no. PA, p. 128015, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128015.
[17] E. Quiñones-Bolaños, M. Gómez-Oviedo, J. Mouthon-Bello, L. Sierra-Vitola, U. Berardi, and C. Bustillo-Lecompte, “Potential use of coconut fibre modified mortars to enhance thermal comfort in low-income housing,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 277, no. October 2020, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111503.
[18] E. E. Ikponmwosa, S. Ehikhuenmen, J. Emeshie, and A. Adesina, “Performance of Coconut Shell Alkali-Activated Concrete: Experimental Investigation and Statistical Modelling,” Silicon, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 335–340, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12633-020-00435-z.
[19] N. Bheel, S. K. Mahro, and A. Adesina, “Influence of coconut shell ash on workability, mechanical properties, and embodied carbon of concrete,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5682–5692, 2021.doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10882-1.
[20] A. J. Adeala, J. O. Olaoye, and A. A. Adeniji, “Potential of Coconut Shell Ash as Partial Replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement in Concrete Production,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2020.
[21] Z. Itam, A. Dzar Johar, A. Syamsir, M. Zainoodin, S. M. M. Shaikh Ahmad Fadzil, and S. Beddu, “Utilization of coconut shell as a supplementary cementitious material in concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 66, pp. 2818–2823, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.522.
[22] Y. Shinohara and N. Kohyama, “Quantitative Analysis of Tridymite and Cristobalite Crystallized in Rice Husk Ash by Heating,” Ind. Health, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 277–285, 2004.doi: 10.2486/indhealth.42.277.
[23] R. S. Bie, X. F. Song, Q. Q. Liu, X. Y. Ji, and P. Chen, “Studies on effects of burning conditions and rice husk ash (RHA) blending amount on the mechanical behavior of cement,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 55, pp. 162–168, 2015.doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.008.
[24] G. C. Cordeiro, R. D. Toledo Filho, and E. M. R. Fairbairn, “Effect of calcination temperature on the pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3301–3303, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.013
[25] Z. Cao, Y. Cao, H. Dong, J. Zhang, and C. Sun, “Effect of calcination condition on the microstructure and pozzolanic activity of calcined coal gangue,” Int. J. Miner. Process., vol. 146, pp. 23–28, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.11.008.
[26] Z. Guo, J. Xu, Z. Xu, J. Gao, and X. Zhu, “Performance of cement-based materials containing calcined coal gangue with different calcination regimes,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 56, no. June, p. 104821, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104821.
[27] V. Blanchar, E. Villalba, S. Monsalve and O. Arbelaez, “Propiedades mecanicas y termicas de plasticos triturados y pelletizados”, Iteckne., vol . 19, no. 2. 2022. doi: 10.15332/iteckne.v19i2.2789
[28] I. S. Agwa, A. M. Zeyad, B. A. Tayeh, and M. Amin, “Effect of different burning degrees of sugarcane leaf ash on the properties of ultrahigh-strength concrete,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 56, no. May, p. 104773, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104773.
[29] Z. Chang, G. Long, Y. Xie, and J. L. Zhou, “Pozzolanic reactivity of aluminum-rich sewage sludge ash: Influence of calcination process and effect of calcination products on cement hydration,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 318, no. December 2021, p. 126096, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126096.
[30] G. P. Lyra, M. V. Borrachero, L. Soriano, J. Payá, and J. A. Rossignolo, “Comparison of original and washed pure sugar cane bagasse ashes as supplementary cementing materials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 272, p. 122001, 2021.doi; 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122001.
[31] M. Rozainee, S. P. Ngo, A. A. Salema, and K. G. Tan, “Fluidized bed combustion of rice husk to produce amorphous siliceous ash,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2008. doi: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60417-2.
[32] S. A. Memon, S. Khan, I. Wahid, Y. Shestakova, and M. Ashraf, “Evaluating the Effect of Calcination and Grinding of Corn Stalk Ash on Pozzolanic Potential for Sustainable Cement-Based Materials,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2020, 2020.doi: 10.1155/2020/1619480.
[33] K. G. Santhosh, S. M. Subhani, and A. Bahurudeen, “Recycling of palm oil fuel ash and rice husk ash in the cleaner production of concrete,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 354, no. November 2021, p. 131736, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131736
[34] W. Cao, W. Yi, J. Peng, J. Li, and S. Yin, “Recycling of phosphogypsum to prepare gypsum plaster: Effect of calcination temperature,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 45, no. September 2021, p. 103511, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103511.
[35] M. W. Clark et al., “High-efficiency cogeneration boiler bagasse-ash geochemistry and mineralogical change effects on the potential reuse in synthetic zeolites, geopolymers, cements, mortars, and concretes,” Heliyon, vol. 3, no. 4, p. e00294, 2017.doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00294
[36] B. S. Thomas, J. Yang, K. H. Mo, J. A. Abdalla, R. A. Hawileh, and E. Ariyachandra, “Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 40, no. July 2020, p. 102332, 2021.doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102332.
[37] A. S. Ruviaro et al., “Characterization and investigation of the use of oat husk ash as supplementary cementitious material as partial replacement of Portland cement: Analysis of fresh and hardened properties and environmental assessment,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 363, no. September 2022, p. 129762, 2023.doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129762.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La revista ITECKNE se encuentra registrada bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional Por lo tanto, esta obra se puede reproducir, distribuir y comunicar públicamente, siempre que se reconozca el nombre de los autores y a la Universidad Santo Tomás. Se permite citar, adaptar, transformar, autoarchivar, republicar y crear a partir del material, siempre que se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría, se proporcione un enlace a la obra original y se indique si se han realizado cambios.
La Revista ITECKNE no retiene los derechos sobre las obras publicadas y los contenidos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores, quienes conservan sus derechos morales, intelectuales, de privacidad y publicidad. Sin embargo esta facultada para editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir el artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.