Mapeo sistemático sobre la evaluación de la agilidad en organizaciones de desarrollo de software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15332/.v16i1.2162Palabras clave:
Agilidad, enfoques ágiles, evaluación de la agilidad, evaluación de procesos software, mapeo sistemático de la literatura, mejora de procesos softwareResumen
Los enfoques ágiles de desarrollo de software proporcionan grandes beneficios para las organizaciones, sin embargo su implementación está sujeta a muchos desafíos. Para las organizaciones es importante conocer el nivel de agilidad alcanzado y las brechas en su proceso de transformación, con el fin de implementar mejoras en sus procesos y aprovechar las ventajas de los enfoques ágiles. Este artículo presenta un mapeo sistemático de la literatura acerca de la evaluación de la agilidad en organizaciones desarrolladoras de software. Como resultado, se encontraron 18 estudios, los cuales fueron analizados y comparados teniendo en cuenta el tipo de estudio, la relación de la evaluación con los principios y valores ágiles, los criterios de evaluación definidos, los métodos de validación utilizados, y las herramientas propuestas. Además, se exponen los factores que influyen en la evaluación de la agilidad y los aspectos que motivan el interés en esta corriente de investigación.
Descargas
Citas
L. Williams, “Agile Software Development Methodologies and Practices,” in Advances in Computers, vol. 80, M. V Zelkowitz, Ed. Elsevier, 2010, pp. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2458(10)80001-4
J. Highsmith and A. Cockburn, “Agile software development: the business of innovation,” Computer, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 120-127, 2001.
VersionOne Inc., “The 11th annual State of Agile,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://explore.versionone.com/state-of-agile. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2018].
A. S. Campanelli and F. S. Parreiras, “Agile methods tailoring - A systematic literature review,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 110, pp. 85-100, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.035
K. Schwaber, “SCRUM Development Process,” in Business Object Design and Implementation: OOPSLA ’95 Workshop Proceedings 16 October 1995, Austin, Texas, J. Sutherland, C. Casanave, J. Miller, P. Patel, and G. Hollowell, Eds. London: Springer London, 1997, pp. 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11
C. A. K.Beck, Extreme Programming Explained. Pearson Education, 1999.
A. Cockburn, Crystal Clear: A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams. Pearson Education, 2004.
M. Poppendieck and T. Poppendieck, Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit (The Agile Software Development Series). 2003.
J. A. Highsmith, Adaptive Software Development: A Collaborative Approach to Managing Complex Systems, vol. 12. Dorset House Publishing Co Inc., 2000.
J. Stapleton, DSDM, Dynamic Systems Development Method: The Method in Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1997.
S. R. Palmer and M. Felsing, A Practical Guide to Feature Driven Development. Prentice Hall, 2002.
S. W. Ambler, “Agile Unified Process.” [Online]. Available: http://www.ambysoft.com/unifiedprocess/agileUP.html. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2018].
“KanBan Fundamentals.” [Online]. Available: http://www.scrumhub.com/kanban-fundamentals/. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2018].
P. Ranganath, “Elevating teams from ‘Doing’ agile to ‘Being’ and ‘Living’ agile,” in Proceedings -2011 Agile Conference, Agile 2011, 2011, pp. 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.40
O. Ozcan-Top and O. Demirörs, “A reference model for software agility assessment: AgilityMod,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2015, vol. 526, pp. 145-158. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_12
E. Rolón, J. Cardoso, F. García, F. Ruiz, and M. Piattini, “Analysis and Validation of Control-Flow Complexity Measures with BPMN Process Models,” in Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, 2009, pp. 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_6
T. J. Gandomani, H. Zulzalil, A. A. A. Ghani, A. B. M. Sultan, and M. Z. Nafchi, “Obstacles in moving to agile software development methods; At a Glance,” Journal of Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 620-625, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.620.625
K. Beck et al., “Manifesto for Agile Software Development,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://agilemanifesto.org/. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2018].
M. Taromirad and R. Ramsin, “An appraisal of existing evaluation frameworks for agile methodologies,” in Proceedings - Fifteenth IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, ECBS 2008, 2008, pp. 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2008.32
O. Ozcan-Top and O. Demirörs, “Assessment of Agile Maturity Models: A Multiple Case Study,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2013, pp. 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38833-0_12
M. Z. Nafchi, H. Zulzalil, and T. J. Gandomani, “On the current agile assessment methods and approaches,” in 2014 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference, MySEC 2014, 2014, pp. 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1109/MySec.2014.6986023
M. Muñoz, J. Mejía, B. Corona, J. A. Calvo-Manzano, T. San Feliu, and J. Miramontes, “Analysis of Tools for Assessing the Implementation and Use of Agile Methodologies in SMEs,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2016, pp. 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_10
O. E. Adali, Ö. Özcan-Top, and O. Demirörs, “Evaluation of Agility Assessment Tools: A Multiple Case Study,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2016, pp. 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_11
K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, “Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 64, pp. 1-8, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
F. McCaffery, P. S. Taylor, and G. Coleman, “Adept: A unified assessment method for small software companies,” IEEE Software, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 24-31, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2007.3
A. Sidky, J. Arthur, and S. Bohner, “A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: The agile adoption framework,” Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 203-216, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0026-z
B. Shen and D. Ju, “On the Measurement of Agility in Software Process,” in Software Process Dynamics and Agility, 2007, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72426-1_3
A. Qumer and B. Henderson-Sellers, “An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering,” Information and Sof tware Technology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 280-295, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.002
M. Taromirad and R. Ramsin, “CEFAM: Comprehensive evaluation framework for agile methodologies,” in 32nd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, SEW-32 2008, 2009, pp. 195-04. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2008.19
F. Mafakheri, F. Nasiri, and M. Mousavi, “Project agility assessment: an integrated decision analysis approach,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 567-576, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280802360884
M. Ikoma, M. Ooshima, T. Tanida, M. Oba, and S. Sakai, “Using a validation model to measure the agility of software development in a large software development organization,” in 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume, 2009, pp. 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-companion.2009.5070967
D. M. Shawky and A. F. Ali, “A practical measure for the agility of software development processes,” in 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 2010, pp. 230-234. https://doi.org/10.1109/icctd.2010.5645881
TongShi, JianbinChen, and J. Zhu, “Study on assessment framework of software process in agile,” in 2010 2nd International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 498-501. https://doi.org/10.1109/indusis.2010.5565802
S. Soundararajan, J. D. Arthur, and O. Balci, “A Methodology for Assessing Agile Software Development Methods,” in 2012 Agile Conference, 2012, pp. 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agile.2012.24
V. Escobar-Sarmiento and M. Linares-Vásquez, “A model for measuring agility in small and medium software development enterprises,” in 38th Latin America Conference on Informatics, CLEI 2012 - Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/clei.2012.6427226
K. M. Poonacha and S. Bhattacharya, “Towards a framework for assessing agility,” in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, pp. 5329- 338. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.599
R. Wendler, “Development of the organizational agility maturity model,” in 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 2014, pp. 119-1206. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F79
O. E. Adali, O. O. Top, and O. Demirors, “Assessment of agility in software organizations with a web-based agility assessment tool,” in Proceedings - 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2017, 2017, pp. 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.61
M. Florêncio, F. Sambinelli, and M. A. Francisco Borges, “ASA: Agile Software Development Self-assessment Method,” in Agile Methods, 2018, pp. 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73673-0_2
H. Kniberg, “Squad Health Check model – visualizing what to improve,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://labs.spotify.com/2014/09/16/squad-health-checkmodel/. [Accessed: 07-May-2019].
“Scrum Level,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https:// scrumlevel.com. [Accessed: 07-May-2019].
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La revista ITECKNE se encuentra registrada bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional Por lo tanto, esta obra se puede reproducir, distribuir y comunicar públicamente, siempre que se reconozca el nombre de los autores y a la Universidad Santo Tomás. Se permite citar, adaptar, transformar, autoarchivar, republicar y crear a partir del material, siempre que se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría, se proporcione un enlace a la obra original y se indique si se han realizado cambios.
La Revista ITECKNE no retiene los derechos sobre las obras publicadas y los contenidos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores, quienes conservan sus derechos morales, intelectuales, de privacidad y publicidad. Sin embargo esta facultada para editar, publicar, reproducir y distribuir tanto en medios impresos como digitales, además de incluir el artículo en índices internacionales y/o bases de datos, de igual manera, se faculta a la editorial para utilizar las imágenes, tablas y/o cualquier material gráfico presentado en el artículo para el diseño de carátulas o posters de la misma revista.
